Why NetJets Matters
There has been a lot of back-and-forth on this blog over NetJets but rarely have I been able to pull the big picture together. It's worth taking a step back and asking, why does what is happening at NetJets matter?
> NetJets is a flagship business for Berkshire; its customers are some of the world’s richest, most famous and influential people. Similar to Berkshire’s insurance businesses, but on a more dramatic and public scale, what NetJets really sells is trust. See’s, GEICO, and the like are associated with Berkshire, but these businesses could be sold and they would remain immensely successful and profitable. That is not true of NetJets.
> NetJets is even more closely associated with Buffett himself because he has been more involved in marketing its product, personally, as a user, and in advertising, than any other Berkshire brand.
> NetJets’ sale contracts extend for five years, although they are puttable after 24 months. NetJets also leases aircraft and has long-term contracts with OEMs, FBOs, and partners such as Marquis. The business is leveraged, the industry is considerably more sensitive to the economy than average, and the long-term nature of its manufacturing and contracting has serious consequences to both the company and its business partners if plans and forecasts are badly executed.
> Berkshire has made something of a public “stand” on NetJets. It has drawn a sharp line between results in 2009 (prior management) and 2010 (current management). The senior management of NetJets is now made up largely of people who either received major promotions from within or who were brought in from MidAmerican; Sokol has referred to this as his “young” team. The economy is in disarray and the business jet industry is moribund. There has probably never been a more challenging time to run a fractional aviation company. Anyone who is interested in business ought to be fascinated by the outcome of this story. Either this team of underdogs will pull off an amazing feat, in which case they are due a great deal of applause, or shareholders are going to be disappointed.
> The man who is running NetJets, David Sokol, is considered the front-runner as Warren Buffett’s successor. Buffett credited him with a turnaround after six months, and is making earnings forecasts rather than underplaying and downplaying the future as he usually does. Others have alleged that Sokol’s management decisions have harmed NetJets’ franchise. Whether he has turned around NetJets undoubtedly will influence whether he runs Berkshire Hathaway someday. No more important question could exist for shareholders of the company.
> What is happening at NetJets undoubtedly is contentious. Every Berkshire shareholder should be curious about learning the truth of the matter, as opposed to making uninformed guesses, because this situation is the only available window into the current management style of the man who might replace Warren Buffett in running Berkshire Hathaway.



Book on Sokol
Your next book should be on Sokol. He is quite a character.
Alice Thank you for a
Alice
Thank you for a wonderful post. I am a huge Warren and Charlie fan, but I don't think they are infallible. Yet, I never ceased to be amazed by how many people think they are and take out their cognitive dissonance on you.
I also like Ted Williams the baseball player, but I don't blame the almanac for reporting Ted's strike-outs along with his hits. It wouldn't be much of a history if it only contained the good bits, would it? And isn't reading about Warren overcoming his fears and challenges the most exciting part of your book anyway?
Previously when I've read your responses to people who think you are bitter or too judgmental, I am not left completely convinced by your replies. It is hard to make a defense which doesn't make an observer wonder if there isn't at least a little truth at the bottom of an accusation. However, in this post where you explain your motivations and your source of insights, I am left ever more convinced that you just want to report facts, that you are a seeker of truth, and that you were the perfect person to write Warren's story.
Thank you.
I check this blog almost
I check this blog almost every day precisely because you speak the truth even if it's uncomfortable. Frankly, your insights are so good I feel like the value to me as a reader probably exceeds the value to you as a writer by a wide margin. It's incredible that you're willing to share them with the public.
I don't understand this mental block people have where they don't want to read negative things about their heroes. That should be the kind of thing you get over in junior high - like when you find out one of your favorite baseball players used to do coke. It's disturbing at first, but as you get older you come to understand that nobody's perfect and you should just accept people's humanity. All the things you admired about him as a baseball player are still true.
One of the things I liked about your book so much was that you gave us the good with the bad. I didn't like or respect Warren any less after I finished reading it. I actually liked him more. Nobody bats 1.000 in every part of their life and he's no different. Imperfections were always going to be there. It was just a matter of revealing the nature of his flaws.
thank you
Nile,
Your reaction to the book reminds me of my husband David's. When he got to the end he started crying. He said he liked Warren better than when he started. "This isn't a book about money," he said. "It's a book about love." My agent, the peerless David Black, didn't know Warren when we began, but got to know him a little bit during the book's writing and publication. He called Warren several times before the end, and told him, "I like you so much more now that I've read this book."
The goal of the book wasn't to make people like Warren, it was to tell the truth. It's just that people who read it tend to react to Warren the way they do in real life. Of those who really know him, even people who find him irritating or people that he's hurt still love him. It's a peculiar thing, but I met people who can't stand Warren, yet still love him in a sense, and who consider him one of the greatest influences on their lives.
Your comments about love
Your comments about love remind me of something Warren said that I thought was pretty stunning. I was lucky enough go to Omaha when I was in business school for one of those sessions he regularly hosts for groups of visiting students. This was early 2007. There's typically a session the Saturday morning of the visit when the group can ask him anything they want. I forget the nature of the question he was answering, but part of his response was "the most powerful force in the world is love." I thought it was a shocking thing for the richest (depending on the day) person in the world to say. I'll never forget it.
One of the things about him is when he says stuff like that you know he's thought it through over and over. It's not just some flip statement he pulled out of thin air.
Another student, apparently unaware of the contours of the playing field, tried to bait him into saying something negative about the "death tax". Warren then launched into a long, and very moving, parable about exactly why there needs to be an estate tax. I almost cried. Speaking of people making fools out of themselves, it was an incredible schooling.
And yes, it's silly that people carry on about you being bitter. That's the kind of knee-jerk conclusion more fit for a cable news pundit than a serious person who has respect for knowledge they don't possess yet.
thank you for the blog
Alice: I finally decide to create an account on your blog so I could send you a belated thank you note. I understand blogging sometimes is a thankless job. But I want to thank you and Ravi for the posting regards Netjet. I'm a shareholder of BRK and honestly besides reading WB letters, you are one of very few trusted sources I gather my collected thoughts. So thank you again.
Min Jin
Alice, can you elaborate on
Alice, can you elaborate on how Warren analyzes financial statements?
Regarding blogging: Alice, I
Regarding blogging: Alice, I blog first for myself, second to my readers. As long as you enjoy freely writing your wisdom, you should not let any reader make you forget this. And I also think you should not let the idiots-out-there puke in 'your house'. Serves no ultimate meaningful purpose. At least thats how I treat them (after initially letting them 'in').
Second, could you please explain exactly what you meant by the following:
"the way he analyzes financials himself is so clearly reflected in the way he creates Berkshire's. Meaning that he can pretty much count on other people not being as thorough as he is"
I'm not sure I understand what you mean, and feel it's important.
wesco
wesco is worth more than book. $325 cash, good insurance biz. Company asleep for years; a platform for CM to emote while BRK was doing exciting things. WEB owes shareholders more.
it's ironic
you bet. This is the conundrum of value investing.
Berkshire's only going to bid for Wesco at a price that makes it a bargain. Turn the question around and ask what the price would be if Berkshire put the whole company up for sale. Would Berkshire give Wesco away for book value? I think not.
However, if 10% of the shareholders tender, Berkshire can squeeze out the rest later at any price it chooses (and will do so).
Alice, Can you say more, now
Alice,
Can you say more, now or in later writings, about how Buffett analyzes financials? For the portion of your readership that looks at financials for a living it would be quite valuable I think, but I don't remember your book covering it much, although I could be remembering incorrectly.
Thank you.
financials
Sure. See reply above.
I admit to being a bit baffled by how little analysis has been done of The Snowball, but Christopher Hitchens says that life is a war of attrition between the literal and the ironic.
Post new comment