"I Don't Consider Management"
This new story is as good example as I have ever seen of why Buffett has been wise to use the same tightly scripted ways of explaining his investing style for decades. Here, Buffett is trying to make a point he has repeated for years (a wonderful business can survive a bad manager; the best manager in the world can't save a doomed industry). For once, he uses slightly different words than usual. And *poof* a pseudo-controversy is drummed up -- all of a sudden it's as if he's taken back everything he's said over the years about the importance of having shareholder-oriented management, of having management that uses capital wisely, of how the right manager can make the difference between a stellar business and an also-ran (the Tom Murphy stories). Must be a slow news day.



Mars
Alice,
If you could, I would like you to address the liklihood that BRK will eventually purchase Mars. It seems this is the type of business that fits Mr. Buffett's description of a good business Was that his ultimate motivation in providing a portion of the financing for the Wrigley deal? I'm sure the purchase price would be huge though. Any thoughts on this would be enlightening. Thanks
What about Carlos Slim
I believe when Carlos Slim buys a company, he puts in his own management. He himself likes to get involved in management.
The power to raise prices and
The power to raise prices and maintain market share is often a direct result of actions undertaken by management...now if this management then leaves the company may still be an attractive investment thanks to the legacy left behind.
Post new comment