Berkshire to Buy Out Wesco

From LA Times.

Start your calculators. What do you think of the price? I would throw out Cort goodwill as valueless but give credit for deferred tax assets = BV of $348/share excluding "float." Berkshire's paying a slight premium to this -- it's not surprising that the stock has traded up to $363. As I read the rules Berkshire does not own enough WSC stock to force a squeeze-out.

But my first thought was not about the valuation. It was that the Wesco meeting will be VERY, VERY missed. For those who went, it was an experience unlike any shareholder meeting on earth and now we have to treasure those memories because there won't be any more.

This, on the heels of the announcement that Lou Simpson is retiring, quickens the pace of change at Berkshire. The Simpson announcement, superficially seems like no big deal - a couple of billion more assets thrown into Warren's pile. But for years, people have speculated about who would succeed Lou. Now that the time has come, there's nobody on deck who can be announced immediately. That's ok, I'd rather they take their time and find the right people than rush into something.  It does highlight that succession at Berkshire is traveling a road with unexpected twists and turns.

Will you share your thoughts

Will you share your thoughts on what this "loss" to shareholders of Berkshire would be? I understand Charlie was never a decision maker at Berkshire, but more of a sounding board for Warren. I consider Charlie a hero for sharing with the world wisdom he's accumulated over his lifetime, but as a shareholder I don't know if it would matter so much if he were to stay on or step aside.

VERY VERY missed...

I will miss the Wesco meeting terribly! For anyone that never got to go, you can always read the Almanack as the next-best-thing. But truthfully, there will never be a good substitute for having attended the actual meeting. Listening to Charlie extemporize on current events, past successes, and occasional failures, the difference between right and wrong, and smart and dumb, all among highly intelligent fellow congregants (not cultists!) that really appreciated him, was a tremendous thrill. This meeting brought forth not just Charlie's intellect, but also his orientation to life in general - in all, his determination to be an exemplar of curiosity, rationality, morality, and of course, good humor!

I use the word "congregants" advisedly. This meeting had church-like overtones, in the very best sense. One left always with a deeply satisfied feeling - of having been set straight about the world, and of being made ambitious to achieve great things in a respectable way, all with a sense of fellowship. It always doubled the spring in my step!

Alice, I can remember seeing you there at least once. Lou Simpson would also pop up at the meeting, not every year, but on a few occasions at least; one time, I introduced myself to him and we chatted. Peter Kaufman once walked up to me, when I arrived early, and made every conceivable effort to be welcoming and convivial. I enjoyed seeing seeing many of the same faces every year. Once, I chatted up a random fellow shareholder for all of 15 minutes - and thereby unwittingly established an annual ritual. Every single year thereafter (although he could never once remember my name!), he sought me out to say hello and chat for two minutes - like an old classmate you knew only from study hall devotedly reconnecting. A nice thing. The Wesco meeting was a marvelous phenomenon. How lucky we were!

But all good things must end. Now as you point out, Alice, Berkshire is plainly in a mode of gradual transition from the old guard to whatever comes next. Turn the page!

Part of the succession plan?

Poor Charlie is almost 90 and it looks like he wants to call it a day. Will Buffett follow?

Charlie

Charlie's 86, and Nancy died last year. He's always been more focused on family and his personal pursuits than Warren is. I really hope he stays involved because otherwise, it's a great loss for the shareholders of Berkshire.

Warren loves it way to much to ever quit voluntarily. As long as he is capable of showing up at work and making decisions he would have to be chained to a tow truck and dragged out the door to make him leave.

Post new comment

If you wish to make a comment, please enter your valid email address. A verification message will be sent to your address to ensure it is real. Comments from people with unverified email addresses will not be published. Thanks for your cooperation.
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em><i> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><img><p><h1><h2><h3><h4><form><textarea><input>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Links to specified hosts will have a rel="nofollow" added to them.

  • You may use <swf file="song.mp3"> to display Flash files inline

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.